One of the most dangerous power players in the U.S. Supreme Court is at it again, wrote the New York Times in a report about the conservative Justice Samuel Alito.
Read more Political scholar exposes surprise gender gap in GOP’s July 4 mania
Alito recalled in his youth his father tapping away on a calculator, trying to redraw electoral maps. All of that came to a head on Tuesday when Alito penned the that struck another harmful blow to the Voting Rights Act. The decision ultimately makes it more difficult to bring racial discrimination challenges to districts.
But the end of Alito’s career is leaving questions about whether he will retire, allowing President Donald Trump to appoint another far-right justice to stack the courts. According to those close to Alito, he has no desire to retire. But if Democrats take over Congress in the 2026 midterms, there could be a renewed call.
“People who know him say that he may not want to jeopardize the chance to have a successor who aligns with his ideology, and that he is mindful of what unfolded when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died in September 2020,” the report said. “Her death set off a confirmation scramble that allowed Mr. Trump to appoint her successor, the conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, shifting the makeup of the court.”
While Alito was quiet in 2024, the past year brought more of his opinions to the bench. It appears Chief Justice John Roberts has assigned decisions for Alito to author when the court intends to hand Trump a “win,” said Stanford law school professor Pamela Karlan.
“It’s hard to think of an area where Justice Alito’s views do not align completely with the conservative legal movement,” she added.
Read more CNN panel cracks up as conservative can’t stop himself from talking over woman
In his opinions on the Voting Rights Act and anything to do with race relations, the Times explained that those appearing before him “will have to provide evidence of intentional race discrimination to prevail. The ruling prompted a Republican scramble to redistrict across the South, and likely handed the GOP an edge ahead of the midterm elections.”
Alito, a constitutional law professor at Yale, Akhil Reed Amar said it’s simply that Alito has greater seniority on the court and his outsized role is easily explained by that.
“It’s a seniority system, and you don’t get the plum assignments in your early years,” Professor Amar said. “The longer you’re around, the more you get to write opinions in big cases.”
Those close to Alito maintain that he remains engaged with the court, despite checking out a day early for their summer break.
Read more Supreme Court dealt the biggest blow to Trump’s control over rogue Republicans: analysis
