{"id":4710,"date":"2026-08-14T07:06:43","date_gmt":"2026-08-14T07:06:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nextaddressamerica.com\/?p=4710"},"modified":"2026-08-14T07:06:43","modified_gmt":"2026-08-14T07:06:43","slug":"republicans-who-fell-for-blanche-being-made-absolute-fools-ex-prosecutor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nextaddressamerica.com\/?p=4710","title":{"rendered":"Republicans who fell for Blanche ‘being made absolute fools’: ex-prosecutor"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Former federal prosecutor Ankush Khardori trounced Republicans willing to accept new Attorney General Todd Blanche’s claims about a possible “slush fund” being dead. <\/p>\n

Read more \u2018Public deserves to know\u2019: Angry judge grills DOJ over hidden Epstein files<\/a><\/p>\n

Republican Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Dr. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) all took issue with President Donald Trump’s push to create a $1.8 billion “slush fund” for people who believe they were unfairly targeted by the federal government.<\/p>\n

CNN’s Boris Sanchez and Brianna Keilar asked the lawyer on Thursday, about Blanche’s speech to the Justice Department this week as he officially took over as attorney general. The speech restated that he would not establish the anti-weaponization fund. But Khardori said that Blanche doesn’t need to. A fund already exists, and the Trump administration has been using it. <\/p>\n

“They have a readily<\/span> available recourse. Actually,<\/span> many of these Jan. 6th<\/span> defendants have subm<\/span>itted claims … <\/span>under the Federal Tort<\/span> Claims Act against the<\/span> government connected to their<\/span> the charges against them,” Khardori explained. <\/span><\/p>\n

In those cases, Blanche and the Trump administration “<\/span>can settle those<\/span> cases and make payouts on a 1-to-<\/span>1 basis, rather than out of a<\/span> fund, and can do so potentially<\/span> without \u2014 well can do so without<\/span> any judicial oversight and<\/span> potentially without the public<\/span> even knowing.”<\/span><\/p>\n

The ex-prosecutor called it “unfortunate” but said the situation was “eminently predictable.”<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more Trump torn apart for \u2018mind-blowing hypocrisy\u2019 on Reflecting Pool retrial<\/a><\/p>\n

“All I have to say to the<\/span> Republican senators who fell for<\/span> the dog-and-pony show around<\/span> this fund and it being dead and<\/span> took the, you know, the<\/span> signature on the piece of paper<\/span> from Todd Blanche as if it put<\/span> this to bed. They’re being made<\/span> absolute fools of,” said Khardori.<\/span><\/p>\n

As The Guardian explained about the Federal Tort Claims Act, “<\/span>The Justice Department has complete and unchecked discretion over whether to settle the claims, giving the Trump administration a powerful vehicle to reward those responsible for violence on January 6.”<\/p>\n

\u201cIf the Treasury Department is not going to enforce the restrictions on the use of the judgment fund, which is to settle impending or imminent lawsuits where there\u2019s some risk of liability, then there\u2019s no limit on what you can use that judgment fund money for, so long as someone files a bogus claim,\u201d said Rupa Bhattacharyya, former director of the DOJ’s director in the civil division\u2019s tort branch. <\/p>\n

Peter Ticktin, a Florida attorney and friend of Trump’s, said he’s filed about 400 claims for cash from Jan. 6 attackers who were either found guilty or pleaded guilty for their crimes. <\/p>\n

One of those demanding $2.5 million is Andrew Taake, a Houston man who pleaded guilty to assaulting a police officer with bear spray and a whip-like weapon. He was sentenced six years in prison until he was pardoned by Trump.<\/p>\n

Read more \u2018Not a threat \u2014 it\u2019s a promise\u2019: Judge says he\u2019ll hold DOJ in contempt<\/a><\/p>\n