{"id":3358,"date":"2026-07-15T12:06:41","date_gmt":"2026-07-15T12:06:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nextaddressamerica.com\/?p=3358"},"modified":"2026-07-15T12:06:41","modified_gmt":"2026-07-15T12:06:41","slug":"expert-details-red-herring-hiding-real-issue-behind-parasite-outbreak","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nextaddressamerica.com\/?p=3358","title":{"rendered":"Expert details ‘red herring’ hiding real issue behind parasite outbreak"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

An expert in infectious diseases this week tossed cold water on the hype and panic surrounding the recent parasitic outbreak, arguing that certain reports about Trump administration cuts have been a “red herring” masking the real issue and making things worse.<\/p>\n

Read more Stunning confession proves Trump insiders know the reckoning is coming<\/a><\/p>\n

As of Tuesday, NBC News reported that around an estimated 7,000 cases of cyclosporiasis had spread across the U.S., according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, with a little over 3,300 being from Michigan. A parasitic foodborne illness, cyclosporiasis can cause days or weeks of severe explosive diarrhea, and is most often spread by contaminated fresh produce, including leafy greens, berries and herbs.<\/p>\n

Since the outbreak began to emerge, reports have indicated that the sweeping cuts to the national health and disease tracking apparatuses under President Donald Trump have made the situation worse, with many reports honing in on a change made to FoodNet last year. Introduced in 1995, FoodNet is a program run in collaboration between the CDC, the Department of Agriculture, the Food and Drug Administration and state health departments, which aims to track the spread of foodborne diseases. In 2025, under the Trump administration, the tracking of cyclosporiasis was made optional.<\/p>\n

In a Wednesday appearance on CNN, Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist and director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, told host Audie Cornish that the attention put on that FoodNet change was a “red herring,” as far as this current outbreak was concerned. He also said that, by his estimation, the outbreak was most likely done, for the time being.<\/p>\n

“There’s a lot of<\/span> misinformation going around<\/span> about this right now,” Osterholm said. “Let me<\/span> tell you, I’m not afraid to be<\/span> critical of the federal<\/span> government or even state<\/span> governments with regard to<\/span> response. But let’s be really<\/span> clear: the changes that<\/span> occurred at CDC were<\/span> eliminating certain diseases<\/span> from what would be considered community<\/span> laboratories, the FoodNet<\/span> system. These are ten sites<\/span> where they do much more<\/span> extensive study. The way cases<\/span> get reported to local and state<\/span> health departments, and the CDC, through the national notifiable disease system, that has not changed. So this idea that somehow what changes occurred at CDC basically caused this outbreak not to be well investigated, just simply [isn’t] true.”<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more Inside Trump\u2019s secret network preparing for civilizational collapse<\/a><\/p>\n

He also noted: “I can say right now, I<\/span> think the outbreak is over. And<\/span> what I mean by that is the<\/span> perishable items that came<\/span> through the food system 4 to 6<\/span> weeks ago are gone. It’s not<\/span> there anymore. People are still<\/span> sick. We’re still going to hear<\/span> about new cases because they’re<\/span> just now getting diagnosed. And<\/span> as you heard on the lead-in on<\/span> the social media commentary, we<\/span> just heard, there are people who are<\/span> still very sick. The good<\/span> news is they can be treated. The<\/span> really also good news is that<\/span> leafy greens generally are very<\/span> safe to eat.”<\/span><\/p>\n

While dismissive of the focus put on the FoodNet changes as a contributor to this outbreak, Osterholm was still critical of the CDC’s response time, as well as <\/span><\/p>\n

“I think this outbreak is one that really needs to be reexamined when it’s all done, because I think, frankly, we should have had these answers weeks ago and didn’t,” Osterholm explained. “And I can’t attribute that to any one thing other than a lack of overall leadership in responding to this. Yesterday, the CDC put out what was called a ‘health alert network’ alert, and at that point, that’s something that should have been sent out four weeks ago, not at the end of this.”<\/span><\/p>\n

He added later: “<\/span>The<\/span> problem we have is that in the<\/span> first instance, like politics,<\/span> all of foodborne disease<\/span> investigations start at the<\/span> state and local level. And<\/span> today, 94 percent of all the budgets<\/span> for all 50 state health<\/span> departments depend on this<\/span> federal support to achieve that<\/span> level of protection. And<\/span> right now, we’re having<\/span> challenges at the state and<\/span> local health department where,<\/span> in fact, these investigations<\/span> begin. So that is a problem. But<\/span> it’s not what has been made.<\/span>The problem with this FoodNet<\/span> system, that’s just a red herring.”<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more The real reason Republicans are trying to tear America apart<\/a><\/p>\n